SPARTANBURG, SC — The Mother of a Middle School Student who was being Suspended has been Arrested after Deputies say she Walked into the School and Slapped the Wrong Child.
Spartanburg County Sheriff’s Deputies say 36-year-old Tyshekka Collier went to Fairforest Middle School Wednesday morning to pick up her son. Principal Ty Dawkins called authorities after Collier walked into the office, mistook a boy for her son and slapped him in the face.
Dawkins said that boy was sick and had been waiting to be picked up.
Dawkins says once Collier realized her mistake, she apologized, then walked over to her son and knocked him to the ground.
Collier was charged with disturbing school and assault and battery. It wasn’t known if she had a lawyer.
Her three children are in protective custody ... YOU THINK !
Dawkins said that boy was sick and had been waiting to be picked up.
Dawkins says once Collier realized her mistake, she apologized, then walked over to her son and knocked him to the ground.
Collier was charged with disturbing school and assault and battery. It wasn’t known if she had a lawyer.
Her three children are in protective custody ... YOU THINK !
Comments » 9
StupidShouldHurtMore writes:
You may remember Judge James C. Williams Jr, our resident hog farmer-turned-judge, from a number of other famous cases ... such as:
His famous quote calling the Bradshaw/Kern-Fuller case "patently absurd." A case, I might add, that the SC Supreme Court picked up on direct appeal, bypassing the Court of Appeal.
Contrary to the ramblings of Mr. Hollerman, this ISN'T common and there were cases, apparently, that were bumped to have this one heard. OOPS.
. . . or . . .
His presiding over John "My Maserati Goes 185" Ludwig's trial. Yes. He's THAT judge.
. . . or . . . (the worst of the bunch)
Ruling in favor of a sex offender and NOT requiring the sex offender to register AS a sex offender:
WYFF4 - Ludwig Judge Scrutinized After Unrelated Ruling
http://www.wyff4.com/news/21681025/de...
May this man NEVER wear the robes of the court EVER again.
- SSHM
( BUBBA'S COMMENT WAS REMOVED BY THE PAPER .... )
StupidShouldHurtMore writes:
"A sensible decent judge is not popular in today's liberal society."
In the context of this article, and based on his reply, it is safe to assume that:
1.) Bubba approves of a judge that is CLUELESS when it comes to making decisions pertinent to Home Rule.
2.) Bubba approves of a judge that basically lets a man who killed another man with his car to WALK.
3.) Bubba approves of a judge that rules in favor of a sex offender and NOT requiring the sex offender to registers AS a sex offender.
I see nothing sensible or decent in your views on the judiciary.
- SSHM
bigredmachine writes: ( LISTEN TO THIS HEEL ! )
2. Ariel was the one that reduced the charges and allowed him to plea guilty knowing that the attorney for him had a battery of mitigation on sentencing and further victims who did not want him to go to jail. Ariel could have easily tried the case but wussed out. The Judge did nothing out of the ordinary in sentencing that defendant.
3. Whether you like it or not, not everyone is a sex offender. Is a 16 yr old a sex offender when he has sex with his 15 yr old girlfriend? Have you read this order as well, did you read the transcripts, maybe the State did not do its job on this case and the Judge ruled in accordance with the law.
I have practiced before Judge Williams on numerous occasions on both the criminal and civil ends and he was by far the most grounded and reasonable jurist in South Carolina. ( LIAR )
( SO LETTING A MURDERER WALK AND A RAPIST TOO IS OKAY MR. ATTORNEY, bigredmachine. JUDGE WILLIAMS JR. MAYBE YOUR HERO. BUT THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE THINK OTHERWISE .... IDIOT .... HOW MUCH MONEY HAVE YOU, LIKE
JUDGE JAMES C. WILLIAMS JR., TAKEN IN PAY OFFS ??!! )
StupidShouldHurtMore writes:
1. Yes/Yes/Yes.
2. While Ariel did reduce the charges, the glaring omission from your analysis, and if my memory isn't failing me, is the fact that Judge Williams was PULLED from Oconee County (or was it Pickens) to specifically handle this case. Why would such a shuffle be permited, especially noting the case backlog, across the board?
Political? Things that make you go hmmm . . .
Oh, and just so we are crystal clear ... SC Code of Laws, Title 56, Chapter 5, Article 23 CLEARLY enumerates jail time as an option for an individual convicted of reckless homicide. I don't believe the judge opted for that jail time, now did he?
3. Stay on topic, counselor. We are not talking about a 16 year old versus that of a 15 year old. We are talking about a specific court case where the defendent PLED to ABHAN. A plea that should have never have happened. Again, we have a case where the judge opted not to run with the heavier sentencing option. In this specific case, one victim was not served by the justice system. Arguably, many others were not by the judges ruling, or more to the point, the lack thereof.
I would venture to guess your assessment of the former judge and that of our current Chief Justice seem to, well, differ shall we say?
- SSHM
May 1, 2010
GeorgyBland writes:
"A person may not be convicted of a violation of the provisions of this item if he is eighteen years of age or less when he engages in consensual sexual conduct with another person who is at least fourteen years of age."
Here's the link: http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c...
So, your scenario of the 16 yr old and the 15 yr old is bogus.
Judge Williams let a a child molester WALK with house arrest and NO registration. People get sex offender registry simply for taking a leak in a bush at a public event. For this offender to get no registration for molestation is unfathomable.
He deserves to be off the bench. Thank God the Chief Judge pulled the plug on whatever other plans he had for his remaining terms of court.