Total Pageviews

Friday, March 30, 2018

// Stephon Clark // Another Criminal Breaking in Cars // Running Through Backyards from Police // Dark // Doesn't Obey Orders // Points a Cell Phone at Police in the Dark and Gets Shot // Why was he running ?? // Why was he breaking into cars // Why didn't he listen .. // Why did he point at Police // His Choice // Obey The Laws and No Problems .. //


 PEOPLE'S COMMENTS FROM ONLINE NEWSPAPER BELOW  : 
  • *Every day and night across America many thousands of blacks are stopped by police for many reasons. The vast majority of them follow instructions, act in a reasonable and civil manner, don't make sudden, furtive or threatening-appearing moves...
    and don't get shot.

    "Racial Injustice": Expecting criminals to obey laws


  • *Drop job applications on the crowd, that should send them scurrying like rat's. 15

  • *funny, i never had a cop point a gun at me,or anyone i know,why? maybe because we have jobs, and dont break the law. two things this thug didnt do 
  • *Replacement window companies have all their employees on 70 hours a week. 3

  • *Gee...I wish I could go protest.
    But I have responsibilities and a job to go, to so I can put food on the table and roof over my children's heads.

  • *The criminal was doing CRIMES his occupation of choice. It is considered a hazardous occupation like being a police officer. criminals don't see the wrong in committing crimes and the possible consequences of not doing what the police want you to do.The Police officers have families they want to get home to safely also.


  • *And the Liberal Media will continue to headline these dirtbags so they can protest some more. HE WAS BREAKING INTO CARS AND STEALING. Both brothers and their mother are dirtbags playing it up for the cameras.9

  • *Sharpton THE NEW WORD FOR JOKE

  • *Take away the free phones, Food stamps @ welfare @ maybe give them a JOB so they wont have time to protest. 6

  • *Since i don't go around in the dark of night breaking into cars. I will not comment on this. As I can't relate to this situation.



DO THE PROTESTERS HAVE JOBS ??  

DID CLARK HAVE A JOB ?? NO ... 

WHY WAS HE RUNNING ?? 

WHY WAS HE BREAKING INTO PEOPLE'S CARS ?? 

WHY DID HE NOT LISTEN TO POLICE ?? 

WHY DIDN'T HE OBEY THE LAW ?? Not steal ... 

WHO POINTS AT POLICE IN THE DARK ????  


WHY DID HE POINT AT THE POLICE IN THE DARK ?? HE 

WANTED TO BE KILLED BY POLICE. SO HIS FAMILY CAN 

GET RICH OFF OF LIES ... 


// Over 500 People have been Shot in Chicago just 3 Months into 2018 // No National Marches // Why is that ? //


Over 500 people have been shot in Chicago just 3 months into 2018. No national marches. Why is that?

// Federal @ State Court // You can be Prosecuted for a State Offense then Stand Trial for the Same Act in Federal Court // It doesn’t matter whether you’ve already been prosecuted by one jurisdiction // Nor does the outcome matter // You can be prosecuted in state court for the state offense and then stand trial for the same act in a federal court if it is also a federal offense // Timothy Da'shaun Taylor and Family - Several People have been Tried in Both State and Federal Courts for the same crime //



Is it Double Jeopardy to Charge a Crime at Both the State and Federal Level?

No. Double jeopardy and “dual sovereignty” are completely different concepts. Nothing prevents competing state and federal agencies from bringing similar criminal charges arising out of the same act against a single defendant so long as a crime can be charged at both the state and federal level.
Double jeopardy only applies to one jurisdiction at a time. A state government cannot bring a second prosecution against you for the same state crime once you’ve been acquitted. The same goes for the federal government regarding a federal offense.

What Does “Dual Sovereignty” Mean?

The concept of dual sovereignty means the federal and state governments may both prosecute you for a crime without violating the constitutional protection against double jeopardy if your act violated both state laws and federal statute.
If murder is committed within the borders of a state, that state has jurisdiction. If the victim is a federal or foreign official, or if the crime took place on federal property or involved crossing state lines, or in a manner that substantially affects interstate commerce or national security, the federal government also has jurisdiction.
In the above example, the Utah sheriff’s deputy was assisting a federal investigation of drug trafficking by providing local surveillance of the suspect eventually charged with her murder. She was murdered in the state of Utah, so Utah maintains jurisdiction.
However, since it is a separate federal offense to intentionally kill a local officer assisting in a federal investigation, the U.S. government also retains jurisdiction. Thus, the suspect can be prosecuted in both a state murder case and a federal murder case.

Does it Matter if You’ve Already Been Prosecuted By Either the State or the Federal Government?






federal court
You can be prosecuted for a state offense then stand trial for the same act in federal court.

It doesn’t matter whether you’ve already been prosecuted by one jurisdiction, nor does the outcome matter. You can be prosecuted in state court for the state offense and then stand trial for the same act in a federal court if it is also a federal offense. If you are convicted in both jurisdictions, you can be punished by both courts.
This doesn’t happen very often when the first jurisdiction convicts you and the resulting sentence is death or life in prison, as is the punishment for first-degree murder. There isn’t much point in the other jurisdiction prosecuting you since the punishment upon conviction is generally the same.
However, as this recent example from Utah demonstrates, just because one government fails to convict you where dual sovereignty applies, doesn’t mean the other government can’t try. It’s not a “do-over.” It’s not “double jeopardy.” It’s perfectly legal.

                           TIMOTHY DA'SHAUN TAYLOR 


                                JUSTICE IS  CALLING 

Several people have been Tried in Both Federal and State 

Courts. Why should Da'shaun Taylor be any different ! 


Thursday, March 29, 2018

// The more you run someone's name down // The more powerful they get // The News Media may wish to rethink their attacks on President Trump // U.S. Jobless Rates Lowest Since 1973 // OBama said, "Those Jobs are gone forever." // Really ?? //


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-29/u-s-jobless-claims-decline-to-lowest-level-since-january-1973

 U.S. Jobless Rates Lowest Since 1973 


AMEN  !



TWO VERY SMART LADIES ...  


 Charlie Kirk and GRIZZLE liked
Bet on this: the more wins on substance &policy, the more economic successes he chalks up, the more rabid & unhinged anti-Trump media will become.
  1. Can’t argue with the results. President Trump’s policies are working->

// 89 % Conviction Rate for No Body Murder Cases // Since the early 1800s, about 480 No Body Cases have Gone to Trial // Of those Cases, about 89 percent Resulted in Convictions // Murder Cases without the Victim’s Body are difficult, prosecutors say, but Winnable //


 Someone please pass this Information along to John Barnett and Da'shaun Taylor's Mom. 89 % Conviction Rate for No Body Cases ...  Not a Witch Hunt ... Called Justice ...    






Thelma Butler’s daughter Pamela, 47, went missing in February 2009. Police arrested Pamela Butler’s then-boyfriend in April 2017 and charged him with murder. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/murder-cases-without-the-victims-body-are-difficult-prosecutors-say-but-winnable/2017

 



When the man charged with killing Pamela Butler appeared in D.C. Superior Court for the first time after his arrest this month, his defense attorney questioned whether prosecutors could even prove a crime occurred.
Butler, a 47-year-old computer analyst from Northwest Washington, disappeared shortly before Valentine’s Day 2009. Authorities insist that Jose Rodriguez-Cruz, Butler’s then-boyfriend, killed her in a jealous rage. But because Butler’s body has never been found, Rodriguez-Cruz’s attorney argued, there is no evidence of a murder — let alone evidence that proves her client is a killer.
“There is insufficient evidence that Ms. Butler is deceased or, if deceased, that her death is the result of a murder or that Mr. Cruz is the perpetrator,” Judith Pipe, of the District’s Public Defender Service, argued at an April 10 hearing.
It was an argument judges in the District have heard before in those rare murder cases in which the victim’s body has never been found. In the nation’s capital, there have been four such cases that have gone to trial, the first dating to 1984, according to prosecutors who track them.
Pamela Butler (Butler family)
But no-body cases, as they are called, are not that uncommon. In Maryland, Montgomery County prosecutors secured convictions in two high-profile no-body murder cases — the killings of Lisa Tu, 42, in 1988 and Michele Dorr, 6, in 1986. In a no-body case in Northern Virginia, a federal jury in Alexandria convicted a former naval intelligence officer in 2006 in the death of his wife, Doris Lentz.
Montgomery detectives also have alleged that two sisters missing from Wheaton since 1975 — Sheila Lyon, 12, and Katherine Lyon, 10 — were killed, even though their bodies have never been found. A suspect in that case, Lloyd Welch, faces trial this year on murder charges in Bedford County, Va., where the girls’ bodies were believed to have been taken and possibly burned.
ADVERTISING
In the District, authorities believe that 8-year-old Relisha Rudd is dead after she vanished in 2014. But that case is unlikely to ever end up in court, as the suspect in her disappearance, a janitor at the homeless shelter where Relisha stayed, was found dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
Without a body, prosecutors lack a key witness during trial, the medical examiner. The medical examiner often gives the narrative of the person’s death, detailing the cause, time and specifics.
“They are difficult. With a no-body case, you don’t have the essential piece of evidence,” said former D.C. prosecutor Tad DiBiase, author of the book “No-Body Homicide Cases: A Practical Guide to Investigating, Prosecuting, and Winning Cases When the Victim is Missing.”
When prosecutors do decide to file charges in such cases, DiBiase said, it often means they have collected a significant amount of evidence. That can include witness statements, DNA or statements from other defendants.
Since the early 1800s, about 480 no-body cases have gone to trial. Of those cases, about 89 percent resulted in convictions, DiBiase said.
Of the four cases tried in the District, all four resulted in convictions, DiBiase said.
The most recent case involved the death of 18-year-old Latisha Frazier of Southeast Washington in 2010. Prosecutors argued that Frazier was brutally beaten by a group of teens, who then discarded her body in a dumpster. Her body was never recovered and authorities believe that it was dumped in a Virginia landfill.
Six people pleaded guilty in the case. One defendant, then-17-year-old Johnnie Sweet, was charged as an adult and pleaded not guilty. After a trial, a jury found Sweet guilty of orchestrating Frazier’s death. He was sentenced to 52 years in prison.
Former D.C. prosecutor Chris Kavanaugh, now a federal prosecutor in Virginia, said as long as other evidence in the case is strong, jurors today are pretty “sophisticated” and realize a murder suspect may dispose of a body in an effort to avoid charges.
But Kavanaugh said other pieces of evidence have to be strong, such as proving a motive, uncovering a false alibi or showing a history of violence.
“Jurors understand when evidence is missing . . . such as a murder weapon in a case, that the person on trial is responsible for the evidence being missing,” he said.
During Sweet’s trial, prosecutors had the advantage of the account of a co-defendant. That witness, a 19-year-old woman, told the jury how she and her friends beat, kicked and choked Frazier to death on Sweet’s orders because he believed Frazier had stolen money from him.
There are no co-defendants in the Butler case. But authorities say there is ample circumstantial evidence as well as a history of violence.
Butler, who worked at the Environmental Protection Agency, had surveillance cameras installed outside her home. The cameras showed Rodriguez-Cruz in and out of the house in the days after Feb. 13, 2009, several times carrying trash bags and once cleaning supplies. He told police that he was removing personal items after he and Butler had broken up.
Though police did not find evidence of blood or a weapon inside the house, they said that parts of the house were in disarray and that Butler’s bedsheets and blanket were missing.
During the initial hearing for Rodriguez-Cruz, prosecutor Deborah Sines noted that Butler had been declared dead after years without contact with her family.
Sines said Butler was abused during her relationship with Rodriguez-Cruz. Sines said the defendant had also abused other women and may also be responsible for the disappearance of his first wife in 1989.
Past evidence of abuse, particularly in domestic relationships, often is key in no-body ­cases, DiBiase said. The majority of such cases, he said, are the result of domestic violence involving a parent killing a child or a boyfriend or husband killing a partner.
DiBiase said assailants in those cases­ often believe authorities will view them as the primary suspect and then decide that if there is no body, it would be more difficult to make an arrest.
In 2010, a D.C. Superior Court jury found Terrence Barnett, then 45, guilty of second-degree murder in the 1999 disappearance of girlfriend Yolanda Bakerafter prosecutors argued that Barnett had a history of abusing Baker. Baker was officially declared dead in 2009, 10 years after she was last seen leaving her Northeast Washington home. Her body has not been found.
Defense attorney Nikki Lotze, who represented Barnett in the trial, said not having a body is a “glaring” piece of missing evidence because it “sets the scene of the crime.” Lotze said that for prosecutors who don’t have any witnesses to a crime, persuading a judge to admit details about a suspect’s past is not a guarantee.
Lotze was not surprised to hear that Rodriguez-Cruz’s attorney immediately argued that there was no proof of Butler’s death.
“By arguing there is no body, a defense attorney is doing their job and pointing out the absence of evidence,” she said.